Brain Mysteries
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to BrainMysteries.com RSS Feed Subscribe
New Articles
Is There a 'Mozart Effect'? Ask a Neuroscientist AND a Musicologist 9/7/2008

Exercise May Help Improve Memory Problems 9/6/2008

Hallucinations in the flash of an eye 9/5/2008

Neuroscientist Scans Brain For Clues on Best Time to Multitask 9/4/2008

Gene Associated with Social Behavior in Animals Has Similar Effects in Human Males 9/3/2008

How accurate is your memory? 9/2/2008

Cocaine-induced brain plasticity may protect the addicted brain 9/2/2008

Trouble Quitting? A New Smoking Study May Reveal Why 9/1/2008

New master switch found in the brain that regulates appetite and reproduction 9/1/2008

Serotonin as a key regulator of fear memory 8/31/2008

Scientist unveils secret of newborn's first words 8/30/2008

Memory Trick Shows Brain Organization 8/29/2008

Subliminal learning demonstrated in the human brain 8/28/2008

Exploring the function of sleep 8/27/2008

'Perfect Pitch' in Humans Far More Prevalent than Expected 8/27/2008

Neurologists Studying Neurons That Control Attention (7/11/2007)

Tags:
attention, neurology

Every kid knows that moms have "eyes in the back of their heads." We are adept at fixing our gaze on one object while independently directing attention to others. Salk Institute neurobiologists are beginning to tease apart the complex brain networks that enable humans and other higher mammals to achieve this feat.

In a study published in the July 5, 2007 issue of Neuron, the researchers report two classes of brain cells with distinct roles in visual attention, and highlight at least two mechanisms by which these cells mediate attention. "This study represents a major advance in our understanding of visual cognition, because it is the first study of attention to distinguish between different classes of neurons," says system neurobiologist John Reynolds, Ph.D., associate professor in the Systems Neurobiology Laboratory at the Salk Institute.

In the experiments, animals learned how to play a sophisticated video game, which challenged their visual attention-focusing skills. During the game, the Salk researchers recorded electrical activity from individual neurons in part of the visual cortex that has been implicated in mediating visual attention.

As illustrated in the demonstration, the neurons respond when a stimulus appears within a window (indicated by the circle) covering a small part of the visual field that the eye sees. This window is known as the neuron's "receptive field." Whenever the stimuli entered the neuron's receptive field, the cell produced a volley of electrical spikes, known as "action potentials", indicated by vertical tick marks in the demonstration.

On some trials, attention was directed to the stimulus that entered the neuron's receptive field, while on other trials attention was instead directed to the other stimuli. The researchers recorded almost 200 different neurons, and examined how each neuron's response changed when attention was directed to the stimulus in its receptive field.

They found that neurons typically responded more strongly when attention was directed to the stimulus in their receptive fields. Upon closer inspection, however, the researchers noticed that different neurons produced different shaped electrical spikes: "broad spikes" and "narrow spikes." Other researchers had previously identified two different types of neurons that produce these two waveforms. The most common neuron type, called a pyramidal cell, produces broad spikes. These neurons transmit signals between different brain areas. The other class, fast-spike interneurons evoke narrow spikes. These neurons only connect to their local neighboring neurons, and are involved in local computations.

After sorting the neurons by waveform, the researchers observed that attention had different effects on the two different types of neurons. The narrow-spiking cells typically fired more frequently when the tracked object was attended than when it was unattended. Broad-spiking cells, on the other hand, were less influenced by attention. Some fired faster, while others fired more slowly when attention was directed to the stimulus in the receptive field. What's more, attention caused the stream of spikes produced by the narrow-spiking neurons to be much more reliable.

"By distinguishing among the different neural elements that make up the cortical circuit, we are gaining a view of the biological underpinnings of attention that is unprecedented in its level of detail," says post-doctoral researcher Jude Mitchell, Ph.D., lead author on the study. He adds that, while there is much more work ahead, "if we can understand how attention is acting on different cell classes, this will significantly improve our understanding of the pathology of neurological diseases in which attention is impaired."

Kristy A. Sundberg, a graduate student, also participated in the study.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the Salk Institute

Homeowner Loan - Renegade motorhomes - New York Hotels - Debt Help

Post Comments:

Search

  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2009 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.